Consultants who use first-hand knowledge to deliver first class advice.
At JANA we showcase our insights and thought leadership.
Our work is centered on achieving the best outcomes for our clients and their beneficiaries.
Our people make all the difference.
Relevant tools, forms and documents.
Expectations are increasing of policy-makers to support decarbonisation of hard to abate sectors. The Energy Transition Commission has published a report ahead of COP 26 outlining six action plans that can deliver a 90% reduction in emissions. Two items of the six-point action plan target the hard to abate sectors – 1) decarbonising the power sector and accelerating the phaseout of coal and 2) accelerating supply decarbonisation in hard to abate sectors.
What are hard to abate sectors?
Hard to abate sectors are the ones where it is much harder to reduce CO2 emissions and the decarbonisation solutions carry a higher cost relative to the current carbon-intensive technologies that these sectors use.
As per Energy Transition Commission’s 2018 report, heavy industries account for more than 30% of the world’s carbon emissions and will account for more in future as the rest of the sectors decarbonise.
Transitioning of the sectors
Overall, these sectors are currently not on track to meet the net-zero emissions targets. The use of fossil energy and fossil feedstock is deeply embedded in the production processes. For example, the use of coking coal for reducing iron ore in blast furnaces. To ensure decarbonisation, there needs to be a shift away from using these fossil-based energies and feedstock. This transition can be achieved through a range of activities including regulatory and policy changes, technological advancements and other factors, including changes in demand.
Many countries’ national strategies to meet the Paris Agreement on emissions reduction do not address hard to abate sectors. The Energy Transitions Commission goes on to say that these sectors can be abated by 2050 “at a cost to the economy of less than 0.5% of global GDP and with a minor impact on consumer living standards.”
All sectors need to play a part in the transition to a lower-carbon world. Increasingly, businesses want to go down the decarbonisation path. It helps them attract “ESG capital” which has led to preparedness to adopt newer technologies. Some companies within these sectors will become part of the solution and will create enormous opportunities for their investors. It is also important for the companies to transition to remain competitive in future.
Is divestment the answer?
We would argue that divestment out of these sectors is not the answer for the world to transition to low carbon. Divestment does not reduce the level of carbon emitted, there is only transfer of ownership. Sometimes this may be more harmful as the assets may be in the hands of owners who aren’t conscious of carbon risk and therefore reduce the chance of transition.
If not divestment, then what?
Asset owners and managers need to regularly engage with companies to accelerate the pace of change towards a more sustainable future. Engaging with management helps investors get a better idea of the impact and strategy of a company’s climate solutions—and the potential risks. Investors either directly engage or collaborate with other investors to undertake targeted engagements with companies to help them improve their overall approach to climate change and have an opportunity to contribute towards low carbon transition.
Engagement is successful not only when the companies have a willingness to take responsibility but also when engagement is relevant; solutions are actionable and the outcomes quantifiable. Companies will generally respond to constructive engagement in a positive way. For successful engagement investors are required to have deep understanding of the climate challenges, as well as individual companies operations.
Typically engagement with companies on climate change includes:
Important issues to engage on in hard to abate sectors
Investors often engage with companies on climate disclosures, carbon targets and reporting. Hard to abate sectors face unique challenges and engagement needs to be at a much deeper level.
Engagement with regulators and policymakers
It is hard to see how the challenge of achieving deep emissions reductions in hard to abate sectors can be overcome without a multi-faceted policy response and government support. Asset owners and investment managers have increasingly been in dialogue with policymakers to support companies on transition.
Measuring the success of engagement
Engagements may not always achieve desired results. However, as with any company engagement tracking and measuring engagement outcomes is crucial for reviewing the progress. Engagement is an ongoing process and tracking and measuring engagement outcomes helps plan future engagements.
COP 26 may provide the much-needed support from policy-makers, but it is equally important for the finance industry to continue to engage with the companies on this challenging issue.
We are here to help.Contact one of our JANA consultants today.
Biodiversity – The Foundation of a Stable Climate
Demystifying the data involved in tracking Net Zero
Measuring scope 3 emissions – a common solution required to ...